Main menu:

Site search

Categories

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Tags

The media flirt

I was recently accused by a cousin of being a “media flirt” - I appreciated the restraint in her language.

It was not long ago that I was described in a feature article in a national paper as “lacking the physical attributes of an Olympiad.” Whilst I could argue that it is true - I don’t know what physical attributes would be fitting of an Olympiad, if any - I instead became the ordinary reasonable audience and assumed the writer thought Olympiad was a fancy word for Olympian - in which case it would still be true, but a little bit cutting. I can’t decide if it is better or worse that he made this assumption having never met me or asked me about any sporting ability or lack thereof.

I assume the article was not intended to be negative, but most have agreed to some degree that I came across as a bit of a loser who can’t get accepted as an Olympic Volunteer (I won’t let the truth get in the way of a good story by mentioning I have never applied to be one). It was a bit of a disappointing result for me, the PR officer trying to push a feature on the Olympics for our Olympic Day event… but I still have it posted up next to my desk at work.

Anyway, last week I was more than happy to play the part of “media flirt” with The Advocate - the trusted local paper of NW Tasmania - which sung my praises in a sporting context, courtesy of an obviously generous press release from my awesome golf club, Seabrook. Even if it implies that I’m not going to turn pro anytime soon (or make the Olympics if Golf gets chosen in October for inclusion), and definitely won’t have been read by the same audience as the last article, I will now shamelessly promote the results of that flirtation!

It’s also interesting to compare the writing standards of a national newspaper in Fiji to a small rural paper in Tassie… No comment.

Comments

Comment from Miles
Time August 12, 2009 at 12:29 am

Fleet I would argue that said ‘cutting’ quote was not directed at you, but rather the writer’s intention was to say “anyone” (or similar phrase) who lack the mystical attributes in question (the 30k or so condoms consumed in the athletes village in sydney comes to mind..)

“…and the only entrĂ© for one [anyone / people] who lack[s] the physical attributes of an Olympiad”

Comment from Fleta
Time August 13, 2009 at 9:49 pm

Yes, I guess it could be read that way - thanks!

I’m not entirely sure I am following on correctly with your thought processes though. Are you suggesting if they supplied extra large condoms, the athletes and their physical attributes would have only gone through 15k!?

(On another tangent, I heard a rumour at some point that athletes - in particular those from poorer nations - were taking advantage of the free condom situation and stockpiling.)

Write a comment